Post 3 Chapter 25-31
I completely disagree with the judges ruling of guilty for Absalom Kumalo and his sentence of hanging until death. It doesn't seem just for him to be hung. Also, I thought the prosecution had to prove the accused guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and I don't think they accomplished this. In my mind there wansn't a definate decision of guilty or not guilty but based on Absaloms testimony I believed his statement that he did shoot Arthur but he did so out of fear. Also, I don't think that Pafuri and Mr. Kumalo, Absaloms cousin, should have been discharged without a sentence. They still broke into a home and they still severelyy injured a man. Were Pfauri and Mr. Kumalo not sentenced because their crime wasn't as bad as Absaloms?
No comments:
Post a Comment